Induction For New External Examiners WelcomeDirectorate of Quality Enhancement a

Induction For New External Examiners WelcomeDirectorate of Quality Enhancement a www.phwiki.com

Induction For New External Examiners WelcomeDirectorate of Quality Enhancement a

King, Jayme, Meteorologist has reference to this Academic Journal, PHwiki organized this Journal Induction For New External Examiners WelcomeDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsProfessor Andrea Dlaska(Pro-Vice-Chancellor, Learning & Teaching)OverviewWelcome to the University of Surrey (Professor Andrea Dlaska) 2. Management Structure Academic Structure Regulatory Framework (Ms Hilary Placito)Role in addition to Function of External Examiners Communication with the University (Dr Svetlana Reston)4. Break (5 mins)5. Workshop: Case Studies6. Lunch (12.30) 7. Meetings with FacultiesDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsManagement structure Academic structure Regulatory frameworkDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsMs Hilary PlacitoDirector of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ards

Dickinson College US www.phwiki.com

This Particular University is Related to this Particular Journal

CharacteristicsFounded in 1891, Chartered in 19663 campuses – Stag Hill, Manor Park, Hazel FarmSurrey Research Park – 150 companies based thereSurrey Sports Park World of workSubject coverage: Science, Engineering, Biosciences, Health in addition to Social Care, Veterinary Medicine, Business, Economics, Management, Law, Hospitality in addition to Tourism, Human Sciences English in addition to Languages, Per as long as ming Arts (including Guild as long as d School of Acting) Vision to become a leading national in addition to international institution by 2017 (University Strategy: 2012-2017)Directorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsStudent populationDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsStudent populationOver 100 nationalities Ethnicity – 63% white, 37% BMEAverage UG tariff score 424 UCAS points UG students – 26% over 21 on entryStudent demographic – c. 31% socio-economic class 4-7- ahead of OFFA target83% UG student progression to year 2 Over 75% of students achieving a first or 2-1 Excellent employability record over a decade; over 1,000 placement partners. 96.9% of 2013 graduates in work six months after graduation, more than 80% in graduate level jobs91% student satisfaction in 2014 – 8th in the NSS overall st in addition to ings PGT – c.20% achieve a DistinctionDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ards

Management organisationDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsFacultiesArts in addition to Human Sciences Business, Economics in addition to LawEngineering in addition to Physical SciencesHealth in addition to Medical SciencesPresident & Vice-ChancellorVP & DVCAcademic AffairsVP & Registrar VP Enterprise& GrowthChief Financial OfficerVP & DVCResearch & Innovations PVCLearning & TeachingDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsAcademic RegistryAcademic organisationDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ards SenateUniversity Learning in addition to Teaching Committee (ULTC)Faculty Learning in addition to Teaching Committees (FLTC)Boards of ExaminersSenate Progression & Conferment Executive (SPACE)Boards of StudiesSenateUniversity Learning in addition to Teaching Committee (ULTC)Faculty Learning in addition to Teaching Committees (FLTC)Boards of ExaminersSenate Progression & Conferment Executive (SPACE)Academic Years 2014/15 in addition to 2015/16Semesters (15 weeks)Semester 1: October – January (Exams Boards in February)Semester 2: February – June (Exams Boards in June)Late Summer resit period: August (Exams Boards in September)Directorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ards

Programme structuresModularAll undergraduate in addition to postgraduate taught programmesCredits1 credit = 10 hours15 credits as long as UG in addition to PGT30 credits in addition to above only as long as projects in addition to dissertationsBachelor’s award 360/480 creditsIntegrated Master’s award 480/600 creditsMaster’s award 180/240 credits LevelsLevels 4-6 – UndergraduateLevel P – Professional Training YearLevel 7 – MastersLevel 8 – DoctorateDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsRegulations: key points (1)Pass mark: levels 4-6 40%, level 7 50%Core modules: all units of assessment must be passed, irrespective of the aggregate module mark; compensation is not allowed to be applied to core modulesCompulsory modules: must be taken but can be compensatedCompensation: 30 credits in first year, 15 credits thereafter ( in addition to as long as PGT), only awarded after resit (except final year)aggregate mark at the level is 45% or above (levels 4, 5 ,6) or 55% or above (level 7)lowest mark is above 30% (levels 4, 5, 6) or 40% (level 7)No trailing failed creditsSummer resits as long as failed modules 45 creditsFailing > 45 credits – have to retake the following yearResit mark capped at pass mark Possibility of a replacement module – one onlyDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsRegulations: key points (2)Honours classification is based on weighted levels aggregate:Bachelors – 35/65 (levels 5/6)Integrated Masters – 25/35/40 (levels 5/6/7)Masters degrees grading system (Distinction, Merit, Pass) based on a weighted averageIntermediate exit awards: 120 credits at level 4 – Cert HE240 credits (120 at level 5) – DipHe300 credits (60 at level 6) – Ordinary degree60 credits (45 at level 7) – PGCert120 credits (90 at level 7) – PGDipDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ards

Code of practice on assessment:Purposes: Integrity of assessment strategy Fairness in addition to rigour in their applicationTransparencyPrinciples: Assessment strategy as long as programmesAlignment with learning outcomes at programme in addition to module level in addition to linked with grade descriptorsAssessment is proportionate – not under or over assessedFeedback to studentsVariety of assessment methodsQuality control (valid processes in place) / quality assurance (mechanisms to check these)Learning support Directorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsOverviewCode of practice on assessment:Balance of types of assessment within a moduleNormally no more than 80% summative assessment by examination across a programmeUnusual as long as a module to have only one unit of assessment or more than 5Written examinations usually 2 hoursDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsTypes of assessmentCode of practice on assessment :Primary marking – mark in addition to provide feedbackSecond marking – second academic checks marking, 100% or a sample in large cohorts (10% of the total or 20 pieces of work)Double marking / Double blind marking – second academic marks the work , 100% or a sample in large cohorts (10% of the total or 20 pieces of work)Double marking required as long as modules worth more than 15 creditsAudit marking – technical checksMarking of dissertations – “The member of academic staff primarily responsible as long as guiding the student in his/her work leading to an undergraduate final year project or dissertation in addition to the postgraduate dissertation supervisor will not be one of the markers.”Directorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsMarking

Code of practice on assessment:Agreement of marksModeration of marksNormalisation/scaling of marks (has to be approved by the External Examiner)Compensation (though it does not affect marks, only module results)Directorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsMarking proceduresExternal Examining processes External Examiners Reports Communication with External ExaminersDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsDr Svetlana RestonQuality Enhancement in addition to Taught Programmes,Directorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsExternal Reference PointsQAA UK Quality Code as long as Higher Education, B7: External Examining, October 2011QAA Framework as long as Higher Education Qualifications (FHEQ)QAA Benchmark StatementsPSRB RequirementsProgramme SpecificationsDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ards

Internal Reference PointsGeneral Regulations (one set as long as undergraduate in addition to postgraduate regulations)Specific Programme Requirements (e.g. Professional Bodies, attendance), programme specificationsBoards of ExaminersCodes of practiceDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsCode of practice as long as external examining of Taught ProgrammesBased on QAA UK Quality Code as long as HE, Chapter B7Fairness, consistency in addition to reference to University regulationsFocuses on the roles in addition to responsibilitiesEligibility in addition to term of officeLead External Examiner rolePublication of External Examiner’s namesDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsRole of External ExaminersRole of External Examiners is to ensure that :Academic st in addition to ards are soundAssessment methods are appropriateStudent achievement is comparableComment on the consistency of procedural aspectsDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ards

Role in addition to Function of External Examiners IConsider the programme(s) as a whole, as well as any particular modular componentsConsider relationship between learning outcomes in addition to assessment methodsEngagement with, not in the assessment process in various ways in addition to stages so as to offer in as long as med judgementsComment on draft examination papers as long as Level 5 in addition to aboveMeeting with graduating studentsDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsRole in addition to Function of External Examiners IIObserve students (as appropriate)Review the level in addition to range of marks, within in addition to between modules, check as long as consistency of markingReceive proportionately representative sample of student work across the full ability range that contains:at least 10%, across the range, or a minimum of 20 scripts or pieces of work, whichever is the lesser.Verify marksMRes/Practitioner Doctorate vivas: on exceptional basis, where appointment is agreed by Senate in addition to is recorded as External Examiner/Assessor.Directorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsRole in addition to Function of External Examiners IIIAttend examination boards: attendance is compulsory where results are being considered that contribute to final awards (Level 5, 6 in addition to 7). Viva voce examinationsSubmit reportsDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ards

King, Jayme Fox 10 News at 5:30 PM Weekend - KSAZ-TV Meteorologist www.phwiki.com

External Examiner ReportReport as long as ms – Directorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ards(http://www.surrey.ac.uk/quality-enhancement/)Code of practiceNotes of guidance Links to general regulations Links to external QAA pages updated Checklist – at the back of the External Examiner’s reportTimescales: 3 weeks after the end-of-year Board as long as UG (no later than end of July) 3 weeks after the final Board as long as PGT (no later than end of November – beg. of December)Report submission electronically to the QES at: externalexaminers@surrey.ac.ukDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsConsideration processVice-Chancellor / Deputy Vice-Chancellor Directorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ards Dean / Associate Dean Learning & TeachingBoard of Studies/Programme Director/ Head of School/DepartmentLead External Examiner (where applicable)StudentsDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ards

CommunicationDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ards:Externalexaminers@surrey.ac.ukDr Svetlana Reston, Quality Enhancement in addition to Taught Programmes (e-mail: s.reston@surrey.ac.uk, tel: 01483689108)Faculty:Examinations OfficerExams & Assessment Teams (Faculty)Programme Director in addition to /or Director of StudiesDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsRaising of serious concernsEE’s right not to sign the mark sheet(s), – in as long as m the University’s Deputy Registrar in writing, as long as submitting these remarks to SPACE.Write directly to VC in addition to President of the University of SurreyIf necessary, submit a separate confidential written reportIf not resolved, – contact QAA through its Causes as long as Concern scheme: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/concerns-scheme-e.pdfDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsCommunication“Good use of online resources in addition to networking” – BMus/MMus Tonmeister “Very good use of VLE’s potential, excellent programme management” – BA Theatre (distance-learning course)“SurreyLearn is excellent . ( samples are available online)” – BSc Sociology programmes“Excellent, impressed by the online system used by Surrey” (in response to “Organisation in addition to administration” by the Department) – BSc Criminology in addition to Sociology“I applaud the University as long as moving to the use of the online plat as long as m in addition to sending materials that way” – BSc Politics programmes“Dealing with the Department was excellent. Perhaps, the Department could reconsider spending one day be as long as e the Board marking in addition to send all scripts by post or make them available on-line.” – /BMus/MMus Music, from 2012/13 reportDirectorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ardsUse of SurreyLearn

Case Study 5You have some concerns about the samples of student work that you received. For example in one final year module, you were sent the work of one group from a total of 10 groups. This was the group where the internal markers had disagreed in addition to a third marker had been deployed to establish an agreed mark, by using a “split the difference” approach. You find it difficult to judge the appropriateness of this procedure as you have no other work to use as a comparator. In addition to this, during your discussions with some of the module tutors it became clear that you were at cross purposes since they assumed (wrongly) that you had access to the VLE in addition to could view aspects of feedback there. You realised that it is now a st in addition to ard practice as long as students to submit their work as long as assessment in electronic as long as mat in addition to a number of tutors mark it in this as long as mat, however, you did not receive any instructions on how to access this VLE plat as long as m.Directorate of Quality Enhancement in addition to St in addition to ards

King, Jayme Meteorologist

King, Jayme is from United States and they belong to Fox 10 News at 5:30 PM Weekend – KSAZ-TV and they are from  Phoenix, United States got related to this Particular Journal. and King, Jayme deal with the subjects like Meteorology

Journal Ratings by Dickinson College

This Particular Journal got reviewed and rated by Dickinson College and short form of this particular Institution is US and gave this Journal an Excellent Rating.