Laws of Order: Expensive Synchronization in Concurrent Algorithms Cannot be

 www.phwiki.com

 

The Above Picture is Related Image of Another Journal

 

Laws of Order: Expensive Synchronization in Concurrent Algorithms Cannot be

Circleville Bible College, US has reference to this Academic Journal, Laws of Order: Expensive Synchronization in Concurrent Algorithms Cannot be Eliminated1 Martin Vechev IBM T.J. Watson Research Center Joint work with: Hagit Attiya, Rachid Guerraoui, Danny Hendler, Petr Kuznetsov, Maged Michael Concurrency2?is about synchronization Synchronization3but how much ?

 Raub, David Circleville Bible College www.phwiki.com

 

Related University That Contributed for this Journal are Acknowledged in the above Image

 

Synchronization4we don?t know Synchronization5manual empirical process Synchronization6time consuming

Synchronization7too much is inefficient Synchronization8too little is incorrect Example: Set ADT9bool add(int key){ ???}bool remove(int key){ ???}bool contains(int key){ ???}

14: Intro so that Routing Algorithms Routing Routing Roadmap Global Dynamic Routing Link State Algorithm: Some Notation Preventing Oscillations

Our Result10Concurrent abstract data types (stacks, queues, sets, hash tables, counters ?)and mutual exclusion algorithms must use expensive synchronization Implications11concurrent programming: guidance on when avoiding expensive synchronization is futile12??although I hope that these shortcomings will be addressed, I hasten so that add that they are insignificant compared so that the huge step forward that this paper represents?.? Linux Weekly News, Jan 26, 2011 lwn /Articles/423994/ Implications

Implications13hardware design: motivation so that lower cost of specific synchronization Implications14API design:API specification affects synchronization Implications15program verification: – declare incorrect when synchronization is missing – simplify verification under weak memory models

What expensive synchronization? 16order: read-after-write17 . write X read Y .read Ywrite Xmodern architectures/languagesRead-after write reordering . write X fence read YFence: enforce order Example: Read-after-WriteWhat expensive synchronization? 18atomicity: atomic write-after-read

Atomic Write-after-Read . read X write Y . . read X write X . Examples:compare-and-swapfetch-and-addread-modify-write Which abstract data types ?20AtomicityDeterminismCommutativity Example: Set ADT21 bool add(v) add v bool remove(v) remove v bool contains(v) check if v is in the set

22 Example: Set ADT Example Histories: add(5): true; remove(5): true; ? add(5): true; add(5): false; ? add(5): true; contains(5): true; ?23specification of Set is deterministic Example: Set ADT24 commutativity: a way so that select methods

25 select non-commutative methods26method A is non-commutative if there exists another method B where: A influences B in addition to B influences A27bool add(v) is non-commutative: Example: Set ADT add(v) influences add(v)

28 Example: Set ADT {} add(5): true; add(5): false; (add influences add)29bool remove (v) is non-commutative: Example: Set ADT remove (v) influences remove(v)30 bool contains(v) is commutative: Example: Set ADT contains(v) does not influence add(v), remove(v) or contains(v)

The End ?52

Raub, David Lifestyle Editor

Raub, David is from United States and they belong to Lifestyle Editor and work for SheKnows.com in the AZ state United States got related to this Particular Article.

Journal Ratings by Circleville Bible College

This Particular Journal got reviewed and rated by 25 select non-commutative methods26method A is non-commutative if there exists another method B where: A influences B in addition to B influences A27bool add(v) is non-commutative: Example: Set ADT add(v) influences add(v) and short form of this particular Institution is US and gave this Journal an Excellent Rating.