Should Consortia Replace Local Collection Development Should Consortia Replace Local Collection Development . of course they shouldn’t! But why not, actually

Should Consortia Replace Local Collection Development Should Consortia Replace Local Collection Development . of course they shouldn’t! But why not, actually www.phwiki.com

Should Consortia Replace Local Collection Development Should Consortia Replace Local Collection Development . of course they shouldn’t! But why not, actually

Doggett, Scott, Contributing Blogger has reference to this Academic Journal, PHwiki organized this Journal Should Consortia Replace Local Collection Development “Is digital different New trends in addition to challenges in acquisition in addition to collection development” IFLA Preconference Munich, 30 – 31 July 2003 Alice Keller, ETH Library Zurich Should Consortia Replace Local Collection Development . of course they shouldn’t! But why not, actually Collection Development: What does it mean Collections are caused to: grow, become larger, more advanced. Good collections don’t develop by chance or coincidence, but by careful planning in addition to selection.

Woodward Beauty College OK www.phwiki.com

This Particular University is Related to this Particular Journal

Collection Development: What sets the limits Collections are developed along collection profiles defined by user requirements. The limits to collection building are financial constraints, available space, resources as long as processing. Collection Development: What sets the limits Speaking to colleagues, financial constraints are the greatest limit to collection development: Most librarians would agree that they should have more funds to fulfil all user requirements. User requirements Funds Which are the Users’ Requirements Nice to have Important to have Core requirements

Which are the Users’ Requirements Looking at E-Journals at ETH Library ETH Library, 3’000 e-journals, 12 months 2001 Focussing on Journals with fewer than 100 Downloads ETH Library, 3’000 e-journals, 12 months 2001 Focussing on Journals with more than 3’000 Downloads Science, Am.Assoc.Adv.Science Nature, Macmillan PNAS, Nat.Acad.Sciences Journal of Biological Chemistry, ASBMB Journal of the ACS, ACS Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Journal of Organic Chemistry, ACS Cell, Cell Press Tetrahedron Letters, Elsevier Organic Letters, ACS Physical Review Letters, APS Journal of Chemical Physics, AIP Chemical Communications, RSC Journal of Physical Chemistry A, ACS Physical Review B, APS Journal of Cell Biology, Rockefeller Univ. Press Biochemistry, ACS Nature Biotechnology, Nature America Applied Physics Letters, AIP Tetrahedron, Elsevier EMBO Journal, OUP ETH Library, 3’000 e-journals, 12 months 2001

8,3% of the e-journals were never accessed during 2001. A further 53% are not accessed more than 50 times. 22 journals are accessed more than 3000 times. Few journals are consulted heavily, many journals are consulted very rarely. ETH Library, 3’000 e-journals, 12 months 2001 Which are the Users’ Requirements Looking at E-Journals at ETH Library Which are the Users’ Requirements Looking at Databases 34% of all accesses are to one database alone. 60% of all accesses are to the top 5 databases. ETH Library, 80 databases with usage statistics, 12 months 2002 Which are the Users’ Requirements Nice to have Important to have Core requirements

Which are the Users’ Requirements What Would Consortia Ideally Include Consortium What Do Consortia Usually Offer Consortium

Financial advantages Extension of library collection Inclusion of new material Cross Access Additional Access Consortium Consortium Consortia – Advantages Consortia – especially Big Deals – offer a slice through all zones. Consortium Consortium Consortia – Facts Advantages of Big Deals: More Titles ETH Library, 3’000 e-journals, 12 months 2001

Advantages of Big Deals: Cross Access ETH Library, 3’000 e-journals, 12 months 2001 Less money left as long as other materials. Consortia “dilute” collection profile. Consortium Consortium Consortia – Disadvantages Consortium Consortium Consortia – Disadvantages

Collection Development in a Consortial Environment Collection Development in a Consortial Environment Academic Libraries of the Future C C C C C C C

Doggett, Scott Edmunds.com Contributing Blogger www.phwiki.com

Academic Libraries of the Future The Journal That Ate the Library The Consortium That Ate the Library GASCO

The Consortium That Ate the Library GASCO The Consortium That Ate the Library Big Deal It is not consortia, but Big Deals, that are replacing local collection development. Getting Things Right Consortia Big Deals =

Alliances are powerful tools as long as a competitive advantage. However, consortia are mostly as long as med on a regional/national basis. Powerful consortia should be alliances based on: common interests (e.g. subject areas) strategic or political goals (e.g. coalition of large libraries of a city) technical co-operations (e.g. common IT infrastructure) Finding the Right Partners The End The Final End

Doggett, Scott Contributing Blogger

Doggett, Scott is from United States and they belong to Edmunds.com and they are from  Santa Monica, United States got related to this Particular Journal. and Doggett, Scott deal with the subjects like Automobiles; Automotive Industry

Journal Ratings by Woodward Beauty College

This Particular Journal got reviewed and rated by Woodward Beauty College and short form of this particular Institution is OK and gave this Journal an Excellent Rating.